FreshRSS

Normální zobrazení

Jsou dostupné nové články, klikněte pro obnovení stránky.
PředevčíremHlavní kanál

OpenAI Vs Reddit: Why did OpenAI withdraw its lawsuit?

Od: Efe Udin
13. Květen 2024 v 08:08
OpenAI

In the realm of artificial intelligence and copyright law, a recent clash between OpenAI and the Reddit community r/ChatGPT has sparked significant controversy and discussions ...

The post OpenAI Vs Reddit: Why did OpenAI withdraw its lawsuit? appeared first on Gizchina.com.

  • ✇Ars Technica - All content
  • Court blocks $1 billion copyright ruling that punished ISP for its users’ piracyJon Brodkin
    Enlarge (credit: Getty Images | OcusFocus) A federal appeals court today overturned a $1 billion piracy verdict that a jury handed down against cable Internet service provider Cox Communications in 2019. Judges rejected Sony's claim that Cox profited directly from copyright infringement committed by users of Cox's cable broadband network. Appeals court judges didn't let Cox off the hook entirely, but they vacated the damages award and ordered a new damages trial, which will p
     

Court blocks $1 billion copyright ruling that punished ISP for its users’ piracy

21. Únor 2024 v 00:06
A man, surrounded by music CDs, uses a laptop while wearing a skull-and-crossbones pirate hat and holding one of the CDs in his mouth.

Enlarge (credit: Getty Images | OcusFocus)

A federal appeals court today overturned a $1 billion piracy verdict that a jury handed down against cable Internet service provider Cox Communications in 2019. Judges rejected Sony's claim that Cox profited directly from copyright infringement committed by users of Cox's cable broadband network.

Appeals court judges didn't let Cox off the hook entirely, but they vacated the damages award and ordered a new damages trial, which will presumably result in a significantly smaller amount to be paid to Sony and other copyright holders. Universal and Warner are also plaintiffs in the case.

"We affirm the jury's finding of willful contributory infringement," said a unanimous decision by a three-judge panel at the US Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit. "But we reverse the vicarious liability verdict and remand for a new trial on damages because Cox did not profit from its subscribers' acts of infringement, a legal prerequisite for vicarious liability."

Read 19 remaining paragraphs | Comments

❌
❌